February 6, 2007
According to this news story:
THE University of Sydney has paid one if its residential colleges $600,000 for land to build a medical research centre, but only on the condition it is never used to carry out foetal stem cell research.
The agreement with St Johns College has raised concerns about academic freedom within the new research institute.
…
But the Greens candidate John Kaye said the ban on stem cell research at the institute would have wide-ranging consequences for public benefit research.
“It’s fundamental to universities that they have free enquiry,” Mr Kaye said.
“Restricting the scientific investigation that can be undertaken at a university institute is not only an attack on academic independence but also establishes an unacceptable precedent.
“Allowing an agreement such as this to dictate limits in scientific investigation opens a very dangerous door to a wide range of organisations to bias research to meet their prejudices.”
If stem cell research could only be conducted at the University of Sydney on this particular land, there would be questions about whether the conditions on the use of the land dictate the research the University can do. However, the University has access to a great deal of other land on which stem cell research can be done. Read the rest of this entry »
No Comments » |
Education, Science |
Permalink
Posted by Sacha
January 3, 2007
In March last year I wrote this post on a question that irked me on the IQ Tickle test and on IQ tests in general, and since then, my blog has been visited by many people searching for phrases such as ”John likes 400 but not 300; he likes 100″ (it’s the question that irked me on the Tickle IQ test, possibly copied straight from the test to a browser).
I’m sure it’s by far the most popular post on my blog: up to yesterday there had been 4,954 views of it according to the WordPress stats. Cheaters!
Well, just for fun, I thought I’d write another post with that phrase in the title and see how many people view it. Let’s see!
No Comments » |
Blogging, Education, General |
Permalink
Posted by Sacha
December 14, 2006
The report of the National Strategic Review of Mathematical Sciences Research in Australia is now available from this website.
The report makes familiar reading to academics and students of mathematics over the last decade. For example, the summary of Chapter 5:- The Way Forward: Strengthening the Research Base, is Read the rest of this entry »
2 Comments |
Education, Math and Physics |
Permalink
Posted by Sacha
October 20, 2006
Here’s an article from Seed Magazine, a US magazine on math and science, about a program encouraging people who have math degrees to (re)train as teachers in an effort to improve kids learning of mathematics, by increasing these new teachers salaries for the first five years in their new career.
The first few paras of the article are as follows:
James Simons has a considerable amount of money. He’s the head of the top-performing hedge fund in the world, Renaissance Technologies Corporation, which he started after leaving a successful academic career in mathematics. More compelling than Simon’s acquisition of wealth is what he chooses to do with it. Rather than collecting art or jets like many of his Wall Street peers, the former mathematician is donating substantial quantities of cash and time to basic science and math education. Read the rest of this entry »
1 Comment |
Education, Math and Physics |
Permalink
Posted by Sacha
October 6, 2006
Today, Julie Bishop, the Federal Minister for Education was quoted in The Australian as saying that
“We need to take school curriculum out of the hands of the ideologues in the state and territory education bureaucracies and give it to a national board of studies, comprising the sensible centre of educators.”
I suspect that the attack on the supposed ideologically biased nature of the current curricula is but cultural politics and a pretext for what appears to be a fairly sensible idea of having a national curricula with perhaps slight variations from state to state or region to region.
Update: Andrew Leigh writes on how national tests, not the curricula, should be standardised, and Andrew Norton puts forward the idea of competitive curricula rather than national or regional curricula.
I’m quite attracted to the idea of competitive curricula.
Update 2: David Kemp writes on competitive curricula in The Australian.
Read the rest of this entry »
No Comments » |
Education |
Permalink
Posted by Sacha