December 5, 2007
It’s been a while since I wrote a post. I’ve been so busy recently I’ve hardly had a spare moment (which is something I couldn’t have imagined six months ago!).
While it’s two days late now, I have to say about Australia ratifying the Kyoto protocol: there, that wasn’t so difficult, was it?
No Comments » |
Economics, Environment |
Permalink
Posted by Sacha
October 24, 2007
Yes, a week and a half ago I started a new job at a different organisation - the Australian Energy Market Commission (www.aemc.gov.au), a government body that writes the Rules for the National Electricity Market and conducts reviews on national energy policies. It’s interesting material for you all economic reformers - the electricity and gas networks are key elements of modern life (imagine the consequences of either drastically failing) and the associated markets are very interesting.
For all those interested in its work, I recommend downloading and reading the documents on its website. I’ve been reading and learning an enormous amount since I started the job and am already working in a project.
No Comments » |
Economics, General |
Permalink
Posted by Sacha
October 15, 2007
An interesting development in Qld - according to the Courier Mail:
LANDLORDS will be able to charge tenants for their water use under legislation to be introduced to Queensland parliament this week, Premier Anna Bligh says.
Cabinet today approved a number of legislative changes dealing with water that will be introduced to parliament this week, and be passed by the end of the year.
Among the changes are new measures aimed at making renters more accountable for their water use, and the banning of any council charges being applied to water from residential rainwater tanks.
The laws will allow landlords who have installed water saving devices - such as dual flush toilets and low-flow shower heads - in their rental properties to have individual meters installed to monitor their tenants’ water use.
This will hopefully make price signals for water more transparent for tenants - folding water charges into a tenant’s rent makes price signals for water very opaque, which could be problematic when water is so scarce in Brisbane. I have always rented and I fully support direct charging of tenants for their water use and individual water metering. It’s not immediately clear to me how you put the incentives in to encourage landlords to put water-saving devices into units, but perhaps this is what is happening in the last para I quoted from the story.
4 Comments |
Australian state politics, Economics |
Permalink
Posted by Sacha
May 5, 2007
I’m reading a number of books on economics & finance at the moment including The Origin of Wealth by Eric D. Beinhocker, the subtitle of which Evolution, Complexity and the radical remaking of Economics describes its focus.
In this book, Beinhocker describes developments in the field of complexity economics in the last 15-odd years, which, in my understanding, seems to be about conceptualising economics arising from interacting agents each possessing incomplete information and processing capabilities.
The novel is very interesting - here is an excerpt on the fundamentals of political ideologies (the Left/Right divide) from pages 418-421. Read the rest of this entry »
3 Comments |
Economics |
Permalink
Posted by Sacha
February 20, 2007
From this weeks Economist:
America’s trade deficit in goods reached $836 billion in 2006. Congressional Democrats seized on the figures to lambast the Bush administration and called for “actions to stand up for America” by ending the “unfair trade practices” of the countries and regions that account for most of the deficit: China ($233 billion), the European Union ($117 billion) and Japan ($88 billion).
I wonder if these “unfair trade practices” include more efficiently produced and/or more attractive goods from China, the EU and Japan, as well as the current valuations of the respective currencies (witness the recent pressure from the US for China to revalue its currency, and the repegging of the yuan to appreciate against the US dollar) ?
Now I don’t know if the currencies are “reasonably” valued (however this may be assessed), but it does seem odd (although understandable in terms of US domestic politics) for the US to appear to attempt to protect its industries by increasing the costs of imports through revalued currencies. But maybe there are unfair trade practices. I don’t know.
Maybe any currency revaluations will constitute a form of protectionism. If the US dollar continues its general downwards trend, it may discourage US consumers buying imports and reduce the trade deficit, which seems a strategy of some US politicians. It’ll be interesting to watch US trade politics given that there is a stronger current of protectionism in Congress and the weakened President’s trade negotiating authority runs out in July this year.
No Comments » |
Economics, International politics, US electoral politics |
Permalink
Posted by Sacha